Midterm Study Guide
ANTH 213D
Spring 2009
Midterm date: April 29
Fundamentals of Linguistics
What are the fundamental
units of language systems? What is
“competency”?
What is “duality of
patterning?”
What are the features of paralinguistics?
Burling’s argument about language and evolution: what,
basically, is it?
“Nativism:”
Or the Chomsky/Pinker Perspective
What is “generative grammar”
(or “deep structure,” or “mentalese”)?
How does Pinker’s
concept of “the language instinct” bear on questions of evolution, the origins
of language, and human nature?
Metaphor, Worldview, and Linguistic
Relativity
What is “cultural
relativism?”
How did a commitment to cultural relativism in
anthropology lead to linguistic relativity?
What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
in its strong and weak forms?
What are some ways that
Whorf connects linguistic structures with non-linguistic features in Hopi
culture?
What is metaphor?
How does the study of metaphor help us in
understanding worldview? Which readings
have tried especially to illustrate the connection between metaphor and
worldview?
Where does Levinson stand on the “simple nativism” vs. linguistic relativity debate?
Conversational Style, Language Ideology,
and Performativity
What does Tannen mean by the term “conversational style?”
What is “persistence” and
“participatory listening,” and how does Tannen
illustrate those concepts in her work?
What is Tannen’s
fundamental argument about the patterning one finds in “conversational rituals”
among men and women?
What is “language ideology,”
and what does the concept suggest about the relationship between language and
the perception/interpretation/judgment of social groups?
How does Barrett illustrate
connections between language ideology, class, race, and power (be sure to be
able to define “mock Spanish”)?
What are some of the
features of hip-hop linguistic structures, and what might they have to do with
social identities and social commentary?
Ditto for the Superstandard English of “nerds” (what’s Superstandard English anyway?).
What are the supposed
characteristics of “women’s language?”
At least two readings contest the validity of the idea. Why? How?
Speaking of which: how,
according to Cameron, do language practices help us “perform” gender (as
opposed to simply reflecting an already given gender existence)? And how does such performance sometimes
violate supposed differences between women’s and men’s conversational styles?
Speech Act Theory and Social Action
Who founded speech act
theory?
What is a “performative?”