Review of Physics Seminar

1. Ability to explain subject matter
I think he really knew his topic and did the best he could to explain it to his audience. I followed his first half hour but then started to get lost. There was a lot of math and advanced knowledge for my understanding. 9/10

2. Quality of visual aids
I liked all of his visual aids. I felt that they helped attempt me to understand better of what he was talking about. However, the slides were very cluttered. I really liked his outline. 9/10

3. Quality of presentation
First, the presentation was way too long. However, he had really good organization with a good introduction and conclusion. Again there was quite a bit of math and other stuff that was confusing. I think this presentation would've been very good if I understood what he was talking about, so Ill give him points for that. 9/10

4. Ability to answer questions
He did answer a question, but I don't know if he answered it efficiently. However, he did talk like he really knew what he was talking about so I'll give him full points. 10/10

Score: 37/40

Good characteristics
I liked how he formatted his information. He gave an introduction, body and conclusion. For each slide, he explained it and then gave the important aspects and a conclusion. Very nice.

Improvements
I think he did a good job. With the time provided, he was way too long. However if he had an hour and a half, he would've finished his seminar without rushing through the end.