|
Biology 475 Molecular Biology Lab Four – Plasmid Midi-Prep and DNA Fingerprinting Kelly L. Shipley Copyright 2003 |
|
Introduction In this lab we are going to isolate a large amount
of the plasmid DNA, which contains our target 16s rRNA inserts. Based on the DNA Probe Hybridization tests
and Restriction Digests we are using sample #52 and #53. In doing the three basic steps of large
scale plasmid isolation we will isolate the plasmid for future DNA
sequencing. After isolating the DNA
we will use enzymes to cut our DNA at specific sites and run them in
electrophoresis gels to determine the size and variety of inserts. |
|
|
|
Midi-Prep Methods |
|
Methods: After centrifuging our
cells into a pellet, we resuspend them using Resuspension Buffer and
pipetting up and down gently using a disposable pipette. |
|
|
Methods: The
multi-port vacuum device created by Danny is used to pull our target plasmid
from the supernatant of our solution down through the tube using the
vacuum. DNA-binding Resin is added to
the solution, the vacuum is turned on and all plasmid DNA bound by the resin
is now too large to go through the filter on the bottom of the tube. At the end of this process all of our
target plasmid DNA is in the tube above the filter. |
|
Restriction
Enzymes Methods
|
Figure Out: |
HaeIII |
Hhal |
HindIII |
|
Recognizes |
GG ↓ CC CC ↑ GG |
G CG ↓ C C ↑ GC G |
A ↓ AGCT T T TCGA ↑A |
|
Bacterial Source |
Haemophilus aegyptius |
Haemophilus haemolyticus |
Haemophilus influenza |
|
Best Buffer |
# 2 (100%) |
# 2 (100%) |
# 2 (100%) |
|
Next Best Buffer |
#1, #4, #6 (all 100%) |
#1, #3, #7 (all 100%) |
#1 (55%) |
|
Units / ul |
10 units / ul |
10 units / ul |
10 units / ul |
|
Cost |
$63.00 / 2500 units |
$60.00 / 1500 units |
$23.00 / 5000 units |
|
Reaction Temp. |
37° C |
37° C |
37° C |
|
# Cuts per 5 kb |
(1/4)4 (x) 5000
bp = 19.53 cuts |
(1/4)4 (x) 5000
bp = 19.53 cuts |
(1/4)6 (x) 5000
bp = 1.22 cuts |
Restriction
Enzyme Cocktails
|
Recipes: |
DNA |
Enzyme(s) |
Buffer & Amt. |
Water |
|
Uncut |
5 ul |
No enzyme |
No buffer |
10.0ul |
|
HaeIII only |
5 ul |
0.3 ul |
Buffer #2 Amt. 1.5 ul |
8.2 ul |
|
Hhal only |
5 ul |
0.3 ul |
Buffer #2 Amt. 1.5 ul |
8.2 ul |
|
HindIII only |
5 ul |
0.3 ul |
Buffer #2 Amt. 1.5 ul |
8.2 ul |
|
Hhal/HindIII |
5 ul |
0.3 ul |
Buffer #2 Amt. 1.5 ul |
7.9 ul |
|
|
Restriction Methods and
Results |
|
Digestion
Methods: Restriction Enzyme cocktails are made
using the above necessary ingredients; specific restriction enzyme (we used
HaeIII, HhaI and HindIII), water, buffer (React #2 ), and our sample DNA
(#52). |
|
|
Results: Sample
#52 was digested and run through gel electrophoresis. Lane M:
DNA marker lane Lane 1:
Uncut DNA, some small fragments seen.
Lane 2:
DNA cut with HaeIII, shows a large band of DNA much smaller than
original DNA. Lane 3:
DNA cut with HhaI shows “smeared” band indicating similarity in size
between different pieces of DNA. Lane 4:
DNA cut with HindIII was only supposed to cut the 5000 bp sequence
once on average. Lane 5:
DNA cut with HindIII and HhaI.
The band is about the same size as the pieces cut by HhaI. |
|
Discussion
In
order to sequence our target DNA in the future, we needed to isolate the sequence
and rapidly amplify the amount which we had.
To do this, we first started our procedure today with the Midi Prep
which is designed to give us DNA product which is compatible with our
sequencing machinery. Plasmid isolation
at this large scale level still encompasses the same basic steps as our
previous mini prep; lysing, separating, and purifying.
Using
restriction enzymes HaeIII, HhaI, and HindIII we cut Sample #52. We did single digest using each of them and
one double digest using both HhaI and HindIII together. The formula for the cocktail used for mixing
the restriction enzymes with our DNA samples is located in the Results section
above. After letting the restriction
digests cut our sample DNA we proceeded to loading the agarose gel. In Lane 1 we had DNA marker, Lane 2 Uncut
DNA, Lane 3 HaeIII, Lane 4 HhaI, Lane 5 HindIII and Lane 6 HhaI and HindIII
together. After the gel had run, we had
a map of where and how the DNA had been cut by the restriction enzymes; this is
called a Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism.
Unfortunately, I did not
use my Sample #53 to create an RFLP also, so I can not compare my results from
Sample #52 to another sample, but can say in looking at other students RFLPs,
that there were some identical to Sample #52, and some which were extremely
different. Even without going any
further with this research, we can conclude from the differences that there is
definite diversity within the Yellowstone microbial mat bacterial population.
From Sample #52 and its’
RFLP I can make some definite observations.
In Lane 1, the uncut DNA did not travel as far as I believed it should
have. If the DNA had been better
prepared, i.e. more super coiled in its’ configuration, I believe it would have
traveled farther. Also there are
evident smaller bands in the uncut DNA lane, telling us that the DNA was
damaged at some point during preparation and smaller pieces were created. Lane 2 was cut with HaeIII, which we
statistically figured would create base pair sequences approximately 256 bp
long. This calculation was also the
same for DNA cut with HhaI in Lane 3.
We can see from our RFLP that there are bands corresponding to a much
smaller weight (i.e. traveled farther) on the gel in Lanes 2 and 3. The smeared appearance of these lanes gives
the idea that the cuts were not exactly at 256 bp each time, but approximately,
which is expected. Lane 4 shows DNA cut
with HindIII. HindIII was only calculated
to cut approximately once per 5000 bp.
From this calculation, I expected to see a band at a smaller weight than
the uncut DNA and another band corresponding to a very small amount of base
pairs. On the RFLP we see no band
corresponding to the smaller pieces, and a very distinct band at a weight
seemingly more than the uncut DNA. This
is backwards from the expected results, indicating a problem in preparation or
execution of the procedure. Lastly, in
Lane 5 we have the double digest. Here
we see clearly a band at the same weight as Lanes 2 and 3 giving the impression
that the sample was cut with HindIII and then with the HhaI, giving many more
distinct pieces approximately 256 bp in length.
In creating an RFLP for a
target sequence, we can use many different restriction enzymes separately, then
together to see what types of pieces we come up with. In doing this we can start to map out the sequence of the DNA, at
least start to understand which restriction sites are there, which genes they
may follow or precede. By cutting with
certain restriction enzymes and then testing our samples for the presence of
functional lac Z or AntR genes, we can determine where those genes may be
within our target DNA.