Right Action: A Means to Prosperity of Body and Mind.
Cory Aders
R 315, Paper One
In the religious faith commonly known as Mormonism
(actually titled The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) there
is a code of health that is believed to be law from God and used to judge
worthiness while also bringing blessings to those who are obedient. It
is called the Word of Wisdom.
For obedience to this code of health one is
supposed to abstain from “tobacco, strong drinks and hot drinks.” These
were later interpreted by the man whom the Mormons believe to be their
first latter-day prophet (the religion’s founder, Joseph Smith) as tobacco,
liquor, tea and coffee. It is reported to have been received as a revelation
from God to Smith at Kirkland, Ohio, February 27, 1833. For a description
of the circumstances surrounding it’s reception I quote from the preface
to it:
As a consequence of the early brethren using tobacco
in their meetings, the Prophet (meaning Joseph Smith) was led to ponder
upon the matter; consequently he inquired of the Lord concerning it. This
revelation, known as the Word of Wisdom, was the result (Smith 175).
Since those times there have been added “harmful drugs” which include
those commonly called recreational drugs (McConkie 845).
As a standard for judgment, the Word of Wisdom
is seen as a key form of obedience by the church members and is part of
every interview pertaining to worthiness for such things as entrance into
the Temple. (For Mormons, Temples are different than the regular meetinghouses
or churches. To them, they are sacred places where God may enter and anyone
unworthy may not.) The reason for the Word of Wisdom being a standard of
judgment is that to obey is thought to bring blessings. Blessings which
are enumerated in a book of what are believed to be modern revelations
and have been compiled since the advent of the church. This book, the Doctrine
and Covenants, states that not only ought the members to abstain from the
aforementioned things but also to use “. . .the beasts of the field and
the fowls of the air, and that which climbeth upon the trees and walketh
upon the earth. . .” for whatever need may arise, be it food, clothing,
housing, or most any other need (McConkie 846, Smith 176).
The blessings that are said to come from obedience
to the Word of Wisdom include spiritual knowledge and understanding, and
increased physical capacity. For a member not to obey this law of the church
is not only to loose blessings but to act counter to God’s command. Originally
though, it was not taken to be a commandment. It was later instituted as
such (by the second latter-day “prophet,” Brigham Young) because of apathetic
response by the original members in obeying it (most of the men of the
church used alcohol and tobacco.)
The attitude of subservience to God by the
church members in obedience to this “law” focuses attention on the correct
way of carrying out one’s responsibilities to God and to the church. It
is an example of the way of Right Action. To not obey, meaning to not abstain
from the aforementioned things, denies a member access to the Temple (where
only “worthy” members are permitted to enter) and to hold a position in
the church. (The church is run and administered by the “worthy” members
and does not have a paid clergy.) Disobedience to the Word of Wisdom is
believed to create a spiritual rift between the member and their contact
with God. Obedience is seen as a valve, and to disobey is to shut the valve
and not allow God to commune with the person. To even be a teacher of a
class of rowdy ten-year-olds requires obedience to the Word of Wisdom.
Persons cannot be members in communion with God, according to Mormon practice,
unless they obey this counsel.
References
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for Comparative
Studies of Religion.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company,
1996.
McConkie, Bruce R. Mormon Doctrine. Second edition. Salt Lake
City: Bookcraft, 1966.
Smith, Joseph. “Section 89.” Doctrine and Covenants. Salt Lake
City: The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 1988.
Jewish Prayer: A Way of Devotion
Cory Aders
R 315, Paper Two
Tefilah, derived from the Hebrew word for judgment,
translates to the English word for prayer. Although a people known for
their fastidiousness in relation to religious things, the Jewish people
have practices which cater to the emotional outpouring of their souls.
Prayer is a principal practice which aims at such a release of emotion
for a Jew.
The term hithpallel is also translated as
prayer and has a particular meaning that the English term fails to encompass.
Hithpallel is a reflexive verb, a verb connoting action upon oneself. It
translates as “to judge oneself” (Burnbaum 657). Jewish prayer is done
in one of two ways: as a congregation or in a group, or as a singular person
speaking as if to God. The attitude of judging oneself before God is part
of what brings the Jew his or her sense of love for the power that God
is said to have over “his people.”
In ancient times, as in the time of the Jewish
patriarch Abraham, prayers were done as though they were a personal, open
conversation with God. Things have changed over time. Now, a prayer is
offered, for the most part, from those prescribed in the Hebrew Prayerbook.
This is a collection of written text, that was written over the span of
2,000 years by people known to the Jews as prophets, psalmists, legalists,
poets and rabbis (Burnbaum 657). These prayers are used on different occasions
in different ways, but the part of prayer being observed in this paper
is the attitude taken toward prayer and the place of it in the lives of
the Jews.
A prayer, for a Jew, is most often done aloud
in the first-person plural (we). This brings in the attitude that they
are part of something more than themselves as individuals: a community
of Jews. The purpose of prayer for a Jew is not to express him or herself
but, “...in its highest form and at its most sincere levels. . .” to perform
“. . .’a service of the heart’ (avodah she’blev).” This part of their spirituality
is heart-felt devotion: an outpouring of emotion that is motivated on a
personal level and realized on a community level (Burnbaum 657, Donin 159).
Devotional forms of worship are not, however,
what serve as a focus of how Jews center their lives on God. Rather their
religious fervor is mainly focused into correct or right actions (or mitzvah)
according to what is taken to be God’s command. They also often utilize
sacred ritual in the performance of their duty to God. Devotion is only
a part of why and how a prayer is performed by an observant Jew.
A morning, noon, and evening prayer is supposed
to be said. To pray more often is encouraged. Occasion is plentiful for
times to pray. But a prayer done without a full purpose of heart is, for
a Jew, a meaningless and worthless prayer. Only those done with concentration
on the task of performing up to the standard of “a service of the heart”
are valid in the eyes of an observant Jew.
References
Burnbaum, Philip. A Book of Jewish Concepts. Revised edition.
New York: Hebrew Publishing
Company, 1975.
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for Comparative
Studies of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Publishing Company, 1996.
Donin, Rabbi Hayim Halevy. To Be a Jew. New York: Basic Books,
1972.
Klein, Isaac. A Guide to Jewish Religious Practice. New York:
The Jewish Theological
Seminary of America, 1979.
The Way of Reasoned Inquiry
as Exemplified in Judaism
Cory Aders
R 315, Fieldwork Paper
The study of scripture in groups, where discussion
and debate can happen, is a traditional Jewish practice. Here in the United
States, though, our rushed society leaves a person little time for such
things. Here in the United States this practice is waning. Traditionally
the Torah and Talmud are studied. (The Torah is more or less the first
five books of the Old Testament of the Christian Bible, and the Talmud
consists in the ancient writings on the law, included in what is called
the Mishnah, and the commentaries of later scholars, known as the Gemara.)
A purpose of such study is to gain an insight
into God’s will. It is a way of getting closer to God by knowing Him better,
according to Jewish belief. Part of their faith lies in doing what, according
to the Torah, God commands. One of those commands is to study the laws
of God (these being found in the Torah and expounded upon in the Talmud.)
Another purpose for a person of Jewish heritage is well stated in a plaque
over the library door in the synagogue Congregation Neveh Shalom. It reads,
”Dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge of our greatest heritage.” They
feel a need to identify with Jews of the past. A final reason would be
to develop good skills in logical debate and reasoning. These things are
very important to traditional Jews.
In order to aptly study an example of the
way of Reasoned Inquiry I attended a study class. It was at 2900 SW Peaceful
Lane in Portland, Oregon. These classes were held on Tuesday evenings,
from 5:00p.m. to 5:45p.m. I went on the evening of the 5th of May.
Upon arrival I found a large synagogue with a nearly empty driveway.
I entered the building and, since no one was in sight, I headed down the
main hallway to find someone. The first door open was that of the library.
A woman was seated at a table, reading. She asked if I needed help and
I explained why I had come (to observe the group study.) She said, “Well
you’re in luck . . . you’ve found the right place.” She then proceeded
to tell me more of how the class studied and from what book at the time.
They studied from a modern English version
of the Talmud. It still contained the writings in the original Hebrew,
but was also translated and had commentary to follow. The Talmud is divided
into sections that pertain to one of three different themes. The one they
were in was called the Bava Metzia. The modern books were organized by
pages as found in the original versions of the Talmud. This meant that
multiple pages were labeled as “Chapter 4, page 52A3,” for example. Also,
the Hebrew writing on the pages had a format of it’s own. In the Hebrew
version, the parts of the Talmud to study by are the Mishnah and the Gemara.
The Mishnah is written to the inside of the pages and the Gemara to the
outside of the pages and the Torah text is in a block in the middle. It
is all traditionally written without the vowels, in the Hebrew version.
The next person to arrive after me was an
elderly lady named Netty. She came in and had a story about her great-grandson
to share with everyone as they came. The interesting part of the story
is how it relates to the topic of this paper. This seven-year-old great-grandson
of Netty’s had followed an organized line of reasoning in order to accomplish
his goal. The story goes that he had been pestering his mother and she
asked him, to keep him preoccupied, to help her tell people why she ought
to be elected to the schoolboard. He sat down and wrote out four reasons,
all valid, pertaining to what would be needed in a good electee to a schoolboard!
The correlation to the topic is that the culture from which this boy comes
emphasizes learning by organized reasoning. At seven years of age this
boy was able to show the difference between himself and other children
his age because he is a Jew.
Everyone “had” to hear the story as they came
in. Then the Rabbi arrived. He was Rabbi Stampfer. He led the discussion
throughout the entire time. After he began, others would express their
own ideas and arguments as they saw something different to interject. There
was no hand-raising or, “well, I think . . ,” but each person would simply
begin talking as another finished. No one was ignored. No preference to
hearing the men first was notable.
Some of the interesting differences for me
were for the whole affair to not begin with a prayer of some sort. I am
accustomed to a prayer beginning every activity done with a religious intent,
coming from a Christian background. Another difference that was expected
was the wearing of the kepats for the men.
Before beginning, Rabbi Stampfer asked who
I was and what I was doing. He said that he had never had an observer who
wasn’t a Jew in attendance, but that I was welcome. As each topic of study
was brought forth, Rabbi Stampfer would read the Hebrew text for everyone
to hear, then translate it into English. After translating it, he would
look at me and restate the phrase so that more of the context was given
and I could follow the topic of the discussion. I felt not like an intruder,
but an observer or beginner who was very welcome to participate.
The discussion centered around the coinage
used in the time near the beginning of the Common Era. Those monetary denominations
being the shekel and two more lesser denominations. The shekel was the
one in question. The Talmud proposed that for a shekel to lose value it
gets used and rubbed and shaved off until it no longer weighs the amount
that it’s supposed to represent. Whatever the cause, at what value does
it no longer become passable as a shekel? This discussion became the pursuit
of the group for the entire time; including the idea that it can become
m’talteleen (ritually unclean) if it passes below half of it’s original
weight. (At half the weight, it is no longer money, but an object, and
subject to the laws that govern ritual uncleanliness.) At this point, it
is said to require destruction through: a hole being put through it to
make it obvious that it is no longer money, or bent beyond repair, or cut
so as to remove too much and make it obvious that some has been removed.
According to an ancient Rabbi, Ammi, it may
also be sold for it’s metal value, to be reminted. And also in the Gemara,
according to Rava, at one isar per dinar (a ratio of 1/24) it’s use changes
from questionable into fraud. And finally, the time ended with a discussion
over who is protected and who might be deceived under this system.
Their reasons at the beginning, of needing
to study these things not for the literal value it could serve in today’s
society, but for insight into the interactions that people have and have
had throughout time are important for not being deceived nor taking advantage
of another, even by accident. There is obvious wisdom in having such a
practice. It has value for all of society and for the individual. Both
will reap benefits of equality and fairness.
As a whole, Judaism would be commonly considered
a way of Right Action. In this instance, the objective of the action is
to intellectually gain a greater understanding of God so as to know Him
better and increase in one’s relationship to God. This orientation earns
this instance of practice the label of being a way of Reasoned Inquiry.
This people, who call themselves “God’s chosen people,” not only find at-one-ment
through obedience to God, but also through knowledge and study of the things
they take to be His will and pleasure.
References
Burnbaum, Philip. A Book of Jewish Concepts. Revised edition.
New York:
Hebrew Publishing Company, 1975.
Buxbaum, Yitzhak. Jewish Spiritual Practices. Northvale, NJ:
J. Aronson
Publishing, 1994.
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for Comparative
Studies of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Publishing Company, 1996.
Donin, Rabbi Hayim Halevy. To Be a Jew. New York: Basic Books,
1972.
The Sacred Rite of Ghusl in the Islamic Tradition
Cory Aders
R 315, Paper Four
Right Actions are very important to Muslims.
While this is so, there are elements of other ways within their practices.
One of those present is that of Sacred Rite. Ghusl is one of these rites.
Ghusl refers to the washing or bathing of the entire body.
The actual practice of ghusl is done
in order to symbolically cleanse the body of impurity and prepare oneself
for prayer and fasting. The need for this rite is also important because
of its reason for being necessary. Ghusl is specifically to be done by
women before sexual relations with their husbands. It is also to be employed
afterward, as well as after menstruation, and nocturnal emission. These
states of being are considered janabah or physically unclean, and understandably
so. Ghusl must be preceded by niyya or a declaration of the intention to
do ghusl. Although water would commonly be used, if it is not available,
dust may be used. This is a practice that would have originated because
of the climate of the founding places of Islam (the Near East.)
Muhammad is said to have mentioned that,
“Purification is half of faith.” As a Muslim one would have a sense of
creating a space and time for the communication with Allah to proceed.
A sense that to do ghusl is to prepare for the presence of divinity, wherever
one may be. It is a Sacred Rite that prepares one’s personal space, symbolically,
as a place into which the presence of the divine may be also. For a Muslim
this is a thing which sets them apart from the world around them and allows
them to feel transported, in a way, into a place where openness and humility
before Allah may be expressed.
This practice is not one that is necessarily
practised well or correctly by all or even most of Islam. It is noted in
the research that it is not very well attended to.
References
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for Comparative
Studies of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Publishing Company, 1996.
Bousquet, G. H. “Ghusl.” Encyclopedia of Islam. 1965 ed.
Yusuf, Imtiyaz. “Rites of Passage.” The Oxford Encyclopedia of the
Modern Islamic World.
1995 ed.
Anointing of the Sick in Roman Catholicism as an example of the way
of Shamanic Mediation
Cory Aders
R 315, Paper Five
Roman Catholicism has much of the faith of
the Catholic people centered in the way of Sacred Rite. In the following
instance, though, there are clearly elements of Shamanic Mediation along
with that of Sacred Rite. The instance is in the case of healing of the
sick through anointing.
Anointing of the sick is considered a sacrament
in Roman Catholicism, usually done with olive oil applied to the body.
It is also followed with prayer. There are, in Catholicism, variations.
This is especially true when looking at specific instances in specific
locations.
The history of anointing, according to J.
P. McClain in the New Catholic Encyclopedia, stems from multiple local
traditions during the time of Christ which were utilized for the healing
of the sick. These all included the use of olive oil. It was plentiful
in the area and had been used in the past for important rites that set
one apart from normal existence (as in a coronation), often for divine
intervention to come to one’s aid.
Originally, or as originally as there is record,
an anointing of each of the five senses (by touching olive oil to the organ
of the sense) and saying a corresponding prayer for each body part was
employed. The earliest record of this goes back a little more than a thousand
years. There are, however, earlier writings which point out that laypersons
also could perform the rite and would take home the anointing oil to do
so.
What makes this a way of
Shamanic Mediation is that they are looking for direct intervention by
‘ultimate reality’. They see the anointing as something that, if done,
brings or opens a pathway for divine intervention to take place. On top
of that, there is also a reason to call this a way of Right Action; this
is considered a necessary rite for one’s salvation . . . one simply must
receive it sometime.
References
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for Comparative
Studies of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Publishing Company, 1996.
Pilch, John J. “Healing.” The Modern Catholic Encyclopedia.
1992 ed..
McClain, J. P. “Anointing of the Sick, I (theology of)” and “Anointing
of the Sick, II (liturgy of).”
New Catholic Encyclopedia. 1967 ed.
Mystical Quest is a way of being religious
in which many of the adherents apply a form of meditation. The meditation
usually includes a specific set of practices that have been found to make
one more aware of all that is going on around them as well as inside, both
physically and mentally. The religious part of the practices brings in
the aspects of ‘ultimate reality’ with which the participants are familiar
(Cannon 22-3). This practice is for the purpose of bringing those who practice
it into a particularly close experience of ‘ultimate reality.’ Most believe
that the experiences one has are not going to be constantly or consistently
direct experiences of ‘the divine.’
The first example is of Buddhism of the Theravada
tradition. Most commonly practiced in the Southeast of Asia, excluding
the country of Vietnam. This meditational practice is called Satipatthana.
It is done through a process of meditative posture (through sitting, usually,)
mindfulness (a controlling of thoughts,) and guided direction of thought
(although not specific) (Cannon 233-42).
The second example is of Eastern Orthodox
Christianity’s Hesychasm. This method of meditation stresses the use of
the Jesus Prayer as a means for attaining the desired mental and spiritual
openness. To focus ones’ attention on the name of Jesus and on its significance
for the one praying. There are two ways that one may do this. The first
is to use the prayer at any points in the day in which one has a moment
to oneself; be it in a hold-up in traffic, a minute between phone calls
at work, or as one is waking up in the morning (Cannon 242-56).
Remarkably, there are many similarities that
can be found between the two ways of meditation. One of those is in the
idea that ‘ultimate reality’ can be accessed through these methods. It
is not the same conception of ‘ultimate reality,’ but a correlative view
that if one pursues meditation on a regular basis and in the prescribed
way one may be able to come into the presence of ‘ultimate reality’ and
be in direct contact with it.
Another point of similarity is in how each
teaches that in order to transcend the conscious part of the self a focusing
on the workings of the body is required. For the Buddhist, one notes the
parts of the body that are touching the ground and focusing on each momentarily.
The Christian focuses his attention on the body also, but on the hands
passing a rosary through them, and also on creating a rhythm with the saying
of the prayer and one’s breathing. (This part, of controlled or regulated
breathing, is an element in both that helps the person center their thoughts
on something other than the world around them.) This part of the practice
is not for everyone and it is explicitly stated that it ought to be done
with the assistance of a spiritual guide. And both point to the end goal
of transcending oneself in the experience as the final capacity to be obtained
by a practitioner (Cannon 235, 251).
A final similarity is in the result of much
practice and concentration. After a time, one may develop the capacity
to not even think about “praying”, or “being Mindful”, and yet be doing
it continuously. This might be seen as having attained to a level of insight
that only few obtain and/or as an obtaining of “grace” for salvation.
The emphases put on the different aspects
of the meditations differs between the two ways. For example, from Theravada
Buddhism an emphasis not in the Eastern Orthodox way is that of posture.
For the Buddhists one must be in a sitting position or, if incapacitated,
may be laying down. The Christian version is to be in a comfortably attentive
position, but only with loose recommendations, no prescriptions.
Another point of departure between the two
methods is in the conception of what is to be obtained through the encounter
with ‘ultimate reality.’ Christianity, according to Bishop Kallistos, seeks
a relationship with God, as they know him to be, on a personal basis. Not
that a conversation is going to ensue, but that one ought to seek to know
God better through the relationship developed. On the other hand, Buddhism
(in this example) looks for an opening of awareness onto the oneness of
everything that exists, and to find peace in the encounter of selflessness.
As examples of the way of Mystical Quest,
as laid out in Cannon’s book, “Six Ways of Being Religious,” each has as
its focus the ideal of coming into contact with whatever the religion takes
to be ‘ultimate reality’. This is accomplished through a form of ascetic
life and meditation which is thought by the adherents to go above and beyond
normal human conscious experience. The intended sentiments are for one
to come to this way of life seeking a joining of their inner self to whatever
is taken to be ‘ultimately real.’
In both of the preceding examples they
seek to experience ‘ultimate reality’ in a way that most people don’t.
They seek to be personally connected, whether with or without their own
personal ego intact. The answers they seek are the ‘reality’ of how things
are and not as they appear to the consciousness and physical senses. Thus,
the authors of the texts on how to meditate and pursue their own experience
of ‘reality’ expect that the reader is looking for a means of going beyond
this physical and mental existence, in some sense, and meet with what is,
for them, ‘ultimate reality’ (Cannon 63).
In these forms of religiousness the participants
take particular note of the passages of scripture that are guidelines (or
can be taken as such) for coming to experience ‘ultimate reality.’ They
hunt not for the feelings or things that one ought to do, but for the ways
in which ‘ultimate reality’ is brought into direct connection with man.
Because of the discipline that one must have in one’s life in order to
have time to pursue such experiences; for they can’t be done in a few minute
attempt, the people who seek a way of Mystical Quest usually practice
in a monastic community of some form. This allows time to be taken for
personal meditation and reflection. It may be done in groups, at least
in some forms. But, for the most part, it is practiced within the confines
of a community of those seeking a similar experience.
Ideally, these communities would be the way
that all people live. But they understand that to pursue such a life takes
more of a commitment than most people can put into a religious practice.
The differences of these ways may be less obvious than between
other ways. (Part of this would be due to the fact that many people don’t
have any experiences to relate to this sort of practice.) There are splits
in how they observe ‘ultimate reality,’ in how they each prepare themselves
for such a life and in what is permissible as forms of meditation (but
this can be between different subtraditions from one general religious
background.)
The experiences of each of those who would
practice Mystical Quest would be fairly similar, at least in outward descriptions.
While the personal details of each experience would be subjective to the
framework of the religion from which they come. This is not to say that
their experiences are the same, only that to an outsider it may easily
appear so. Anyone who would pursue a way of Mystical Quest is looking for
a similar experience of ‘ultimate reality’ that will go beyond the conscious
realm of things . . . into a deeper insight into how things are and where
things come from and how they always will be.
References
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for Comparative
Studies of Religion.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company,
1996.
Final Exam: R 315
Cory Aders
R 315
There are multiple ways in which one can study
religion. One of those ways is comparatively. This is called the phenomenology
of religion. Two books which come from this orientation are by William
Paden and Dale Cannon. Paden’s book is titled, “Interpreting the Sacred:
Ways of Viewing Religion” which will be called “Interpreting” from here
on out. Dale Cannon’s book, “Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for
the Comparative Studies of Religion” that will go by “Six Ways” for the
rest of the paper.
Although the phenomenology of religion is
classified in many ways Cannon and Paden have two distinct points of view.
For Paden, phenomenology of religion is a manner of studying religions
that looks only to the similarities and can very well ignore the differences.
This may be so in some cases, but not all. Cannon sees phenomenology of
religion as capable of noting the similarities and the differences.
According to Cannon, to study religions in
an empathetic manner is the only way in which one is able to capture the
view of the insider, that thereby one may understand their feelings, to
a degree. He calls it “empathetic objectivity” when one does so without
sounding as though one is an insider (Cannon 17-20).
Paden sees the ideal point of view as being
one where the interpreter acknowledges his/her bias(es) in interpretation
and includes the relative cultural and social understandings used to interpret.
He calls this a relativist perspective. It is related to the interpreter
as well as to what is being interpreted (Paden 133-4).
In their two varying perspectives there are areas of difference.
One is in how the capacity of the individual interpreting is seen. Cannon
would say that a person does have the capability to be objective, yet also
understand as though one were an insider. Paden thinks that such an understanding
is impossible, or, at least very unlikely. They differ, also, in their
respective conceptions of the validity of what the insider sees and feels.
For Cannon, that is part of the interpretation. When looking at a specific
phenomenon one takes into account the feelings and reports of the insider.
Paden would not use the insiders thoughts and views as much more than possible
corroboration for his interpretation.
Paden would say that Cannon overestimates
the capacity of people to see things from the others’ “moccasins,” so to
speak. Cannon would oppose the idea that the phenomena can only be understood
as an interpretation of something that cannot be understood thoroughly
from the outside. Paden’s view could be seen as pessimistic, even if valid
for some peoples’ capability to understand.
In Paden’s book, “Interpreting,” he does give
a set of ways that religious phenomena may be classified; similar to Cannon’s
ways as defined in “Six Ways.” The first of his categories is Ecstatic/Emotional
Experience, relating to the emotionally charged versions of experiencing
god or spirit. His second is Contemplative Wisdom and Introspection
that is seen in the focus on insight. Third, Sacrifice and Asceticism.
It is based on the practices of renunciation of worldly things and the
sublimation of ones’ desires. Fourthly is the Ethical, relating to interpersonal
relations and the correct manner of carrying them out. And fifth, Paden
sees Faith as a separate way in which one can express their religious belief.
He does note that this is just a sample of the ways in which religion can
be measured. (Paden 121-2).
Cannon’s six ways include the following. The
way of Shamanic Mediation, in which a medium is used, who is believed to
be proficient in spiritual matters, to bring immediate intervention into
play in the circumstances. The way of Reasoned Inquiry; where one seeks
to know ‘ultimate reality’ through logical processes of study and reasoning.
The way of Mystical Quest is where the participants practice an ascetic
life or a meditation in order to be open to the reception of experience
with ‘the divine”. The way of Sacred Rite includes the practices which
are believed to bring one into the presence of ‘ultimate reality’ through
the rituals being performed. That these events are patterns of things that
have happened forever. The way of Right Action is where the insiders do
the things they do as living out the way things ought to be and reaping
special assistance for it. The way of Devotion encompasses those who are
overwhelmed in an emotional purging and supports them through the overbearing
trauma of their circumstances (Cannon 51-68).
The way of Devotion for Cannon is similar
to the Ecstatic/Emotional Experience of Paden. Paden’s Contemplative
Wisdom and Introspection parallels Cannon’s way of Reasoned Inquiry fairly
well. Paden’s Ethical fits with Cannon’s Right Action. And Paden’s Sacrifice
and Asceticism meet with Mystical Quest. None of these is a perfect fit,
one to one, but Paden and Cannon see similar things going on in religious
phenomena. Paden’s Contemplative Wisdom and Introspection could also parallel
the way of Mystical Quest, as conceived by Cannon.
What Paden does in his book is propose that
religious comparison inherently leaves out parts and narrows perspectives.
In “Six Ways” Cannon is open to criticism, but maintains that one can study
a phenomenon without bias and even may be able to add something to the
understanding and perspective of the insiders, if done correctly.
The differences they have appear to be those
of different people with different capabilities at empathizing with others.
They have different talents developed when it comes to seeing things from
another’s’ point of view. Neither is wrong or right, but each has created
a theory that suits their respective abilities in openly evaluating religious
experience in it’s own context.
References
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for Comparative
Studies of Religion.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company,
1996.
Paden, William E. Interpreting the Sacred: Ways of Viewing Religion.
Boston: Beacon Press,
1992.
Emily Ocheskey
Religion 315D
Way of Devotion
May 8, 1998
Works Cited
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for
Comparative Studies of Religion.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1996.
Case, Margaret. "A Day in the Life of Krishna." Parabola
22.1 (1997): 16-20.
Emily Ocheskey
Religion 315D
Way of Wisdom
April 17, 1998
Works Cited
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for
Comparative Studies of Religion.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1996.
Shapiro, Herman, ed. Medieval Philosophy. New York:
Modern Library, 1964.
Emily Ocheskey
Religion 315D
Way of Right Action
April 10, 1998
Works Cited
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for
Comparative Studies of
Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1996.
Queen, Christopher S. and Sallie B. King, eds. Engaged Buddhism.
Albany: State University of
New York, 1996.
Emily Ocheskey
Religion 315D
Way of Sacred Rite/Fieldwork Report
April 27, 1998
Works Cited
Bridges, Linda. "The Beauty of Truth." National Review
49.9 (1997): 58-59.
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for
Comparative Studies of Religion.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1996.
Knoll, Sister Katherine. E-mail interview. April 23, 1998.
Emily Ocheskey
Religion 315D
Way of Shamanic Mediation
May 18, 1998
Emily Ocheskey
Religion 315D
Comparative Paper
May 29, 1998
Works Cited
Cannon, Dale. Six Ways of Being Religious: A Framework for
Comparative Studies of Religion.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1996.