|
1
|
- Nancylynn Ward-Bridges, Ph.D. Candidate
- Annette Reichman, Chief, DCDB, RSA
- April 10, 2003
|
|
2
|
- Congressional authority for
entering into interagency agreements is granted by the Economy act of
1932 as amended (31 USC 686).
- This act allows any Federal agency to contract with another Federal
agency to contract with and recover all or part of cost incurred of the
contractor agencies surveyed which contains allowance for providing
information to consumers upon request.
|
|
3
|
- Strengthens the need and drive for collaboration as promoted by
Interagency agreements:
- ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) of 1990
- WIA (Workforce Investment Act) of 1998
- The Rehabilitation Act of 1973
- IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) – Reauthorization of
1997
|
|
4
|
- As amended in 1998 to the Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 101, (a)(8)(B) ) which
calls for development of interagency agreements in EVERY state
- State plan shall specify agency financial responsibility, conditions,
terms, procedures of reimbursement, procedures of solving interagency
disputes, coordination of services.
|
|
5
|
- …”vocational rehabilitation program and other appropriate agencies, will
ensure that an interagency agreement or other mechanism for interagency
coordination takes effect between any appropriate public entity,
including the state entity responsibility for administering [programs]
in order to ensure the provision of VR services as described in
subparagraph (A)(5)(D) and (paragraphs 1-4, 14) of section 103 (a) that
includes individualized plan for employment….”
|
|
6
|
- Agency(ies) financial responsibilities
- Conditions, terms, procedures of reimbursement
- Resolution of interagency agreement disputes
- Coordination of services procedures
- Responsibilities of other public entities
- Responsibilities under other laws
- Reimbursement
- Methods of service provision(s)
|
|
7
|
- Emphasis is on COLLABORATION
between agencies in an effort to cut down on duplication in services,
waste and promotes effective and efficient resource management practices
- Agencies (Local, State, Federal as well as Non-profits) are expected to
improve coordination of services, maximize resources, increase
effectiveness of employment and transition efforts.
|
|
8
|
- Three Types
- Highly formalized documents
- Can be an informal agreement also known as Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU’s)
- Informal, verbal agreements
|
|
9
|
- Documents designed to promote successful inclusionary experiences for
all parties involved in process
- Agreements incorporate policies and practices of agencies working
together to provide a service
- Provides procedural guidelines in service provision
|
|
10
|
- All agencies/individuals who understand the Power of collaboration.
- Educational Agencies, Institutions or Programs
- Vocational Rehabilitation
- Human Services (drug rehabilitation, juvenile services, welfare, job
placement services, etc.)
- Non Profits
|
|
11
|
- They are to be used in a way that will help agencies look at:
- Outcomes,
- Accountability, and
- Investment,
- for the consumer using the services or services provided for the common
good
|
|
12
|
- Promotes action that directly or indirectly improves personal outcomes
for those services and promotes systematic changes and approach in how
service delivery is to be provided in Human services and Educational
programs.
|
|
13
|
- Logistics and support issues should be addressed
- Specifications, as much as possible, in how services will be provided
- Develop a plan of action in how problems, whenever they arise, will be
addressed
|
|
14
|
- 5 points
- External Environment Assessment
- Internal Environment Assessment
- SWOT Analysis
- Agency/Agencies’ commitment
- Individual commitment
|
|
15
|
- Things to consider
- Types of Allies outside of your organization
- External current conditions that influences quality and quantity of
work and have impact on agency’s success
- Collaboration opportunities and with whom
- Funding trends
- Political climate
- Organizational structures
|
|
16
|
- Areas to consider
- Current conditions that impacts successful collaboration opportunities
- Identify things your organization does well or does not do well
- Administrative support for collaboration
- Personnel resources
- Agencies’ policies and procedures
- Type of allies existing within the organization
|
|
17
|
- A Critical Exercise!!
- SWOT is an Acronym for:
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- Opportunity
- Threats
|
|
18
|
- Agency’s commitment to
- Provision of coordinated and integrated services
- Recognizing, preventing or circumventing barriers that may interfere
with implementation of collaboration relationship(s)
- Consider proactive measures to lessen negative influences
|
|
19
|
- Individual’s commitment
- Type of actions you, as a professional, are willing to take to provide
more integrated and coordinated approach to service delivery
systems/programs
- Your allies in this vision
|
|
20
|
- 4 questions:
- What is the purpose of collaboration??
- Who are your allies??
- Who OWNS the agreement??
- Will this Agreement lead to Action??
|
|
21
|
- An event that creates a need for a collaborative relationship with an
external agency
- Experimental in nature
- Ensures a continuation of activity or relationship between parties
involved
- Promotes or provides a rationale for systematic change
|
|
22
|
- Internal Allies:
- Who would be supporters/facilitators of the proposed relationship from
within your organization?
- External Allies:
- Who would serve as advocates, from the outside, for this proposed
service or program?
- System Allies:
- Champions of the cause across the spectrum and can keep the purpose of
collaboration alive between the interested parties.
|
|
23
|
- Owners are those who:
- Implement the collaboration effort
- Conducts the monitoring activities
- Offers oversight and vision for the collaborative effort
- Maintains the operational relationships at the “firing line” of service
delivery systems/programs.
|
|
24
|
- Make sure Agreements are:
- Concrete and action oriented
- Clear and unambiguous goals and specific plan of action
- Include specifics
- Such as staffing, budgets, write award demonstration grants, etc
- Clear and unambiguous outcomes and measurements
- Clear expectation of allotment of resources
|
|
25
|
- One must do the following to ensure interagency agreement’s success:
- Problem Identification
- Expectation/Probability of Success
- System boundaries
- Means for information Sharing
- Means for problem solving
|
|
26
|
- Steps to undertake:
- Regular meetings between programs
- Letters of agreements that does the following:
- Define roles and responsibilities
- Defines specific criteria for admissions and conditions to service
requirement
- Clearly defined boundaries between programs
|
|
27
|
- Steps to undertake (continued):
- Continued assessment of resources’ availability internally as well as
externally
- Develop a Directory of agencies/programs that provide similar services
for referral and resource sharing purposes
- Education/Training of its’ staff
- Quarterly summaries of current programming
- Joint training programs on common issues
- Continual strategic planning
- Continued willingness to COMMUNICATE!!!!
|
|
28
|
- They are as follows:
- Definition of outcomes
- Definite measurements of outcomes
- Internal Allies are in place
- External advocates are involved and committed
- Partnership of agreement is clearly defined
- Agreement is Action-oriented
- Built in Mechanism for Communicating and resolving potential
Agency(ies) disputes and/or differences
- Promotes community inclusion
|
|
29
|
- Collaboration is a mutually beneficial and well defined relationship
entered into by two or more organizations to achieve a common goal
- Relationship includes a commitment to
- Mutual relationships and goals,
- Jointly developed structure and shared responsibilities
- Mutual authority and accountability
- Sharing of resources and rewards.
|